About Me

Name: Jim
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Why They Don't Care -- !!

Yesterday, after learning about the President's nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court I emailed a news program, stating essentially that I didn't know which sickens me more -- the fact that the major media has their gustatory organs inserted so deeply into the President's execretory expulsion oriface -- or that they all know that we know they're doing it, but don't care, and do it anyhow.

I honestly believe that the President could nominate Adolf Hitler's charred ashes to the Supreme Court, and the media would gush just as enthusiastically about the wisdom of such an appointment, after which he would easily be confirmed by the lunatics in the Senate.

The President (and those who think as he does) control the Executive and Legislative branches of our government, as well as most of the judiciary and mainstream media. Essentially, they can do as they please, and they know it. As such, they thumb their noses at their detractors and unashamedly force their agenda down the throats of the American public, knowing that they answer to no one.

As long as the majority of the media promotes their agenda, they will remain in office and do whatever they fancy at any given moment. The President can issue an Executive Order tomorrow that the sky is brown, and they know that there's nothing anyone can do to challenge it.

As long as the American public continues to purchase the lying rags they call newspapers (and magazines), and watch their networks, they will control the power from Washington to your front door (and beyond).

If you want those in Washington to answer once again to the people, you have to cut off their lying tongues in the media. Stop watching the major networks -- and I just don't mean their news broadcasts, but all of their programming. Cancel your subscription to the New York Times, Washington Post, etc. Hit them in their wallets. Show them we won't sit for their lying crap any longer.

If you don't, then you might as well just hang it up.

It's over.

They've won.

 

Welcome to the Obaman States of America, where the only endangered species it will be permissible to kill will be the conservative.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What would REAGAN do?!?

Okay.  No need to elaborate or embellish needlessly.  Straight forward and to the point...
 
China.  Iran.  North Korea.  Russia.  Afghanistan.  Pakistan.  Iraq, etc... (pick your poison)
 
What would President Reagan do?!?
 
Naturally, we can't ask him.  However, many of the former President's close advisors are still with us.  Surely, they'd have some indication as to what he'd do in these situations.
 
The world no longer respects the United States.  While our image had deteroriated under President Bush (whom I still admire and I believe did his best), the world now sees the United States as a milquetoast singing "Kumbaya" thanks to the Commuity Organizer-in-Chief.
 
Our enemies feared us under Reagan.  Many today probably don't remember Muamar al-Gaddafi. 
 
The reason no one hears much about the Libyan toughman today is that Reagan dealt with him as only Reagan could. 
 
A continual, annoying thorn in the side of the United States (much like present-day North Korea and Iran), Gaddafi would just not go away -- that is, until Reagan showed him just how much he was willing to take of the madman's incessant, insane rantings. 
 
Will the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue learn from history that your enemies respect MIGHT, not WARM EMBRACES.
 
The President seems to be following the Carter path to global humiliation, when instead, he should be following the Reagan path to fear (from our enemies) and respect (from our friends)?
 
So ask yourself -- what would President Reagan do?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is the President Guilty of TREASON, or just a Naive Fool?!

Someone needs to say it. No one else will. Therefore, here it is.

According to the United States Constitution (something our President should actually read some day), treason against the United States is defined as "levying war against" or "adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort".
 
While it's clear (at least for the moment) that President Obama has not levied war against the United States, he has certainly given the enemies of this country aid and comfort.

Or what would you call the release of intelligence documents which detail United States tactics utilized in our war on terror (uh, excuse me -- "overseas contingency plan") -- essentially emasculating and crippling our national security efforts in the pursuit of this nation's enemies, as well as the timely receipt of information requisite in thwarting said enemies from intended actions against our nation?

If this isn't giving definite"aid and comfort" to the enemies of the United States, I don't know what is.

 

I'm sorry, but this is exactly what the President (and any of the incompetent morons who have thus advised the President) have done.

I have no doubt that the President's recent actions (as well as his earlier blunders regarding Guantanamo and "legal rights" for enemy combants) have practically guaranteed the United States will suffer another (likely more devastating) attack from this nation's sworn enemies -- all the smiling, hand shaking, embracing, and singing of "Kumbaya" with those who hate us, notwithstanding.

And while Neville "Peace in our time" Chamberlain's contribution to the devastation of World War II can be somewhat excused as naivete, Obama has no excuse. History shows that appeasement of one's enemies does not, nor has ever worked. (Someone feel free to show me even one illustration from history where it has.)

 

Will no one in the media call it what it is?!? Please -- !!

 


Obama is American's 21st century Chamberlain. What we needed was a Churchill. What we got is (at best) a naive fool -- (at worst) a traitor. What we will get is a devastating attack by the sworn enemies of the United States. The President has guaranteed it. 

This is what happens when the people elect naive, incompetent, inexperienced children. A man whom I wouldn't hire to run a local burger franchise is calling the shots for our nation.

God help us.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Some Candid Analysis of Washington...

As I try to keep tabs on what's going on in our nation's capital, it's difficult to keep from bursting a blood vessel, while throwing up my arms and defeatedly admitting that it's over. The United States (certainly the United States as known by the generations who have preceded us) is dead. The policies of the last two months have seen to that. Surely, were our nation's forefathers able to somehow view the workings of the new adminstration in Washington, they would undoubtedly crawl back into their graves, pulling their tombstones down over their heads in shame, prefering the stench of death and decay to that of the excrement which is coming out of the White House and Capitol.

While it's difficult for me to express an opinion regarding the new President and his policies without breaking practically every law of Christianity, let me just say that I've never seen a leader whose arrogance requires a redefinition of the term, magnified by the number of he dollars he's spending on a plan which is assuring the death of our nation.

Were the enemies of the United States able to hand-pick the perfect agent of destruction for the United States, they couldn't have done a better job than our own naive, insipid electorate did on November fourth.

Like a spoiled two-year old, he wants what he wants when he wants it, the way he wants it, with a pretty bow on top.

Anything short of complete and willful compliance incites a tantrum and threats of "you'd better give it to me now, or else the sky will fall..."

I hear people (even some of his critics) referring to him as "intelligent".

Please!! Have we redefined that word, as well?

No intelligent human being would propose any (much less all) of what this spoiled child has demanded in his first sixty days.

Okay, enough about him. (Believe it or not, the world doesn't revolve around his image, nor do stars shine from his excretory expulsion orifice.)

That being said, let's briefly take a look at the President's cohorts in Congress...

Oh dear. Must we?

 

The Democrats are at best: incompetent. At worst, they are evil, selfish, arrogant, manipulative, uncaring, felonious liars, thieves and blasphemers. (I am trying to be brief, or I would go on at length...)

The Republicans are at best: cowards -- for the lack of temerity they've shown in refusing to expose these policies (and those who propose and embrace them) for what they are: dangerous!! At worst, the Republicans are little better than their opponents from across the aisle (see above).

The President and his followers in Congress are a threat to the stability and well-being of this nation. Their polices are destructive and permanent.

No longer a matter of right vs left, or liberal vs conservative, it's become a matter of survival.

If our elected leaders don't step in now to undo the damage of the new administration's incredibly disasterous policies, there will (very shortly) no longer be a nation left for them to govern.

"The kings of the earth who committed fornication and lived luxuriously with her will weep and lament for her, when they see the smoke of her burning, standing at a distance for fear of her torment, saying, 'Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! For in one hour your judgment has come.'

The Community Organizer-in-Chief is presently seeing to that.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The President's New Toy

It didn't take me long to realize that the President is treating his new job like a kid whose just been given a new toy, which he can't wait to play with as much as possible before he breaks it, tosses it aside and looks for something new.

What's the President's new toy?

The way the President's been acting these past few weeks, he's like a kid who just found Daddy's credit card, and immediately rushes out to buy everything he's ever wanted, but previously was unable to acquire.

Yes. The unfortunate thing is that it's our credit card the President is using, and that doesn't seem to bother him in the least.

This supposed stimulus bill is nothing more than a liberal wish list a trillion dollars long (and counting)...

Every liberal pet project they've ever dreamed, salivated and panted over -- just toss it onto the pile of the President's (and Congress's) wish list, and whoa-la! It's incorporated into the bill, and the printing presses at the Treasury start rolling out the bucks, and bucks, and bucks, and bucks, and bucks...

Not that the bill won't deliver a single job (other than more government jobs -- just what we need)...

Not that the only thing this bill is stimulating is the Democrat's pet projects...

Not that the President has already broken his promise for "open government" -- with every bill put online for everyone to see before anyone rushes to vote on it... (yeah, right; some idiots actually believed this guy)

Not that the President rushed this bill through so quickly that not a single member of Congress who voted for it was able to read it (or the American public they supposedly represent had a chance to scrutinize it), because, after all, this was an "urgent crisis" that needed to be dealt with "NOW"... (If it was so important to rush this bill through "NOW", then why is the President waiting three days to sign it? Could it be, that his vacation is more important than the urgent financial crisis he insisted needed to be dealt with "NOW"?!?!?)

Not that our country is spending more than it has ever spent, even though no one has the money to pay for it...

As long as the President maxes out his Daddy's credit card (that's Uncle Sam's credit card -- or OUR credit card, for any idiot liberals who may be reading this), that's the only thing that matters. So what if they drag the country into the toilet in the process?

The only businesses that may be doing well this time next year are those who print the "Don't blame me, I voted Republican" merchandize, which I imagine will suddenly be very popular.

This is what happens when we elect children.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Legacy of Lincoln (a Republican)...

On the 200th anniversary of the birth of the first Republican President of the United States, I am reminded of perhaps Lincoln's greatest achievement and legacy -- the liberation of an enslaved race.

The irony doesn't escape me that now, a vast majority of those descended from liberated slaves have abandoned the party of Lincoln, and vote enmasse for the party who wanted to keep them all in chains. Indeed, if the President's party had its way, he wouldn't even be allowed to vote for President, much less occupy the office. (I am also befuddled in my attempts to understand how African-Americans see the President as "one of their own" -- particularly, given that most African-Americans are probably descended from slaves, and the President is not.)

NOTE: In voting for the 13th amendment to the United States Constitution, all 118 Republicans in Congress approved the measure to end slavery, while only 19 of 82 Democrats supported freedom for Americans of African descent. Likewise, it was the Republicans in Congress who singlehandedly pushed the 14th and 15th amendments through Congress (granting citizenship and guaranteeing voting rights for African-Americans), while not a single Democrat in Congress voted for either amendment.

This leads me to believe one of two things about a majority of the descendants of those freed by the actions of our first Republican President -- those who repeatedly vote for Democratic candidates. Either they are ignorant of the facts (that it was the Republicans, not the Democrats, who ardently supported and fought for their liberty), or abhorantly ungrateful both to President Lincoln and his party, without whom, they certainly would not enjoy the freedom and rights they do this day.

So, which is it? Ignorance or ingratitude?!?

Personally, I cannot fathom how anyone would want to claim either as the reason behind the grossly illogical fact that the majority of African-Americans continue to support the party which viewed them as property.

Just something to ponder as we celebrate the anniversary of Lincoln's birth, and why the President (who claims to admire Lincoln), has chosen instead to side with the party who wanted to keep African-Americans in chains. I find this most peculiar. Am I alone in this, or is something woefully amiss by this whole scenario?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

To those who CLAIM to represent the PEOPLE in Washington...

To my Senators and Congressman,
 
Thank you for your recent votes to support the President's "stimulus" package.  Your doing so has completely destroyed any faith I had in what I believed to be a representative government.  The people who elected you have clearly spoken out against this shameless bill (to refer to it as pork would be an insult to hogs, pigs and other creatures who demonstrate a far greater understanding of basic economics than apparently most in the Capitol).  In spite of this, you have arrogantly thumbed your noses at the very people who gave you your job, and made a mockery of the United States Congress.
 
You have ignored your constituents and followed a President who (in my opinion) I would not trust as general manager of a local burger franchise.  The Community Organizer-in-Chief has chosen to ignore the will of the people who elected him, as you have chosen to ignore the will of the people who elected you.
 
While I cannot speak for the other Americans who you've blatantly betrayed and  insulted with your elitist arrogance and self-aggrandizement, I can certainly say that you will never get my vote (nor the votes of my immediate family) at any time in the future -- neither in primaries, nor in the general election.  I will fully support your opponent (regardless of party or idiology), both financially (as much as I may be able) and through ardent campaigning, as well as word of mouth.
 
You have betrayed your trust and your country, and there is nothing you can do to make up for this affront in my eyes (and as I suspect, the eyes of many of your constituents). 

When it comes time for your re-election, should we still have a country (which is doubtful, given the bill you just passed), I hope that everyone you've betrayed will remember to hold you accountable for the actions you've taken today.

God help us.  Congress and the President certainly won't.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Open Letter to the Community Organizer-in-Chief...

Dear President Obama,

Firstly, let me begin by stating what should be an obvious fact. You were elected as President, not Dictator of the United States.

The arrogance of your "my way or the highway" mentality with the "stimulus" bill only proves what I've always imagined about you -- that you are far too immature and inexperienced to hold the office of this country's chief executive. You daily prove me correct in that assertion.

You imagine that somehow, since you (the "chosen one") managed to secure a victory in November, that you get whatever you want, whenever you want it. Well, I'm sorry, but an "educated" man such as yourself should know that forty-two men were elected to that office before you, and not one of them got their way on every issue (most were blessed to get their way with any issue, given the nature of a democratic, representative government, derived of a populace with differing views).

Secondly, it is not your money to spend.


To listen to your ranting at those who dare to oppose (or delay) your precious, almighty "stimulus" bill, one would think that you're pulling the cash out of your back pocket. You're not. It's our money you want to spend, and as such, you are obligated to consider our imput. A greater percentage of people oppose this "stimulus" package than those who (unwisely) elected you to office. Isn't this supposed to be a representative government? Or are you just too arrogant to accept that you are wrong on this issue? The money for this alleged "stimulus" bill can only be derived by three means -- raising taxes, borrowing, or printing it.

Raising taxes will break the back of an already-weakened economy. Borrowing it will place an enormous debt on us, our children and descendants for untold generations. Printing it will only devalue our money and propel inflation through the roof. Yeah. All great prospects for an economy already teetering on the edge of the toilet.

Apparently, you and the imbeciles in Congress can't seem to grasp the idea of representative government. Instead, you somehow imagine that as a result of your January 20th coronation, every person on earth should bow in the shadow of your greatness, in joyful praise to the great deliverer.

While you, your fellow thugs in Congress, and your docile lapdogs in the mainstream media may actually have deluded yourselves into believing that you've somehow dethroned God, you need to realize that you are a mere man.

The sun does not rise and fall at your bidding.

The sooner you (and those you deceived into electing you to office) learn that lesson, the better off we will be.

However, as I'm afraid that you've achieved far too much, far too easily, the realization of that fact is not forthcoming. Like many before you, a dosage of humility is not part of your itinerary, and by the time you learn that "pride comes before a fall", you will have (unfortunately) taken the United States of America with you.

God help us all. A community organizer and children rule over us.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our eternal report cards...

1) Do the Scriptures teach judgment or accountability before God?

"...because He (God) has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained." Acts 17:31 (Paul speaking)

For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. Romans 14:10

According to the Scriptures, we are accountable to our Creator, God.

2) On what basis will God judge each person who stands before Him?

For whoever shall keep the whole law, yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all. James 2:10

For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, "Cursed is everone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them." Galatians 3:10 (quoting Deuteronomy 27:26)

...for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God... Romans 3:23

So, likewise, according to God's word -- all have sinned. While God demands a perfect, righteous life (an eternal report card of perfect A's), instead, each and every one of us stand before Him as condemned sinners (have report cards filled completely with failing grades -- F's).

3) How does the fact that we are sinners bear on our status before God?

For the wages of sin is death... Romans 6:23

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? I Corinthians 6:9

"The Son of Man will send out His angels, and they will gather out of His kingdom all things that offend, and those who practice lawlessness, and will cast them into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth." Matthew 13:41-21 (Jesus speaking)

Anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire. Revelation 20:15

According to God's word, our sin (the F's on our report card) disqualifies us from eternal life, and condemns us to eternal punishment and separation from the holy presence of the LORD.

4) Is there anything we can do to pay the penalty for our sin?

Therefore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in His sight... Romans 3:20

The Scriptures declare that we cannot erase or atone for our sin (the F's on our report card).

5) As we cannot pay the penalty for our own sin, how then can we be saved?

"You must be born again." John 3:7 (Jesus speaking)

But to him who does not work, but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness..." Romans 4:5

"For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul." Leviticus 17:11 (God speaking)

...without the shedding of blood there is no remission. Hebrews 9:22

For He (God) made Him (Jesus) who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. II Corinithians 5:21

But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." John 3:16 (Jesus speaking)

"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you wil be saved..." Acts 16:31 (Paul & Silas speaking)

For whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved. Romans 10:13 (quoting Joel 2:32)

God's word proclaims the good news that Jesus paid for our sin on the cross. He took all of our sin (our bad grades -- all the F's accumulated over a lifetime of sinful rebellion against our Creator) and bore the penalty we deserved in our place.

Additionally, Jesus lived the sinless life God requires of each of us, and offers to credit His perfect righteousness (a report card of complete A's) to those who believe on Him, and trust in Him alone for their salvation.

...not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith... Philippians 3:9

We can face God under the condemnation warranted by our sinful lifestyle (by insisting that we submit our own, failed report cards), or we can accept Jesus's gracious offer of dying in our place, fully paying the penalty for our sin, and crediting us with His perfect righteousness (swapping our failed report card with His fully perfect one).

For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast. Ephesians 2:20

So, whose report card do you want to submit at the end of your life? Yours or His?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ask No Questions!! Take No Prisoners!! The Closing of Guantanamo Bay and the Disposition of Prisoners, thereof...

Regarding the President's intentions of closing Gitmo and doing who-knows-what with the terrorists residing therein who want to destroy our nation...

While I've never had the priviledge of serving in our nation's military, I can only imagine how such a decision will effect those on the front lines, facing our enemies on a daily basis. I can see them involved in operations which bring them into direct contact with the sworn enemies of our nation, and confronting those enemies on an individual basis. I can imagine those enemies throwing up their arms and laying down their weapons when confronted with the business end of an M16 (if that's even what we use these days), knowing that they'll be escorted back to sanitary, comfortable accommodations, given a clean copy of the Koran, and more likely fed better than they’ve eaten in their lives -- then be treated with kid's gloves (interrogation is verboten!), and most likely eventually released from custody right into the heartland of America, where they can freely travel and wreak havoc at will.

I can also imagine what I'd be thinking if I were one of our combat soldiers, confronting a terrorist who has thrown up his arms in surrender, knowing that our new Commander-in-Chief will likely give them a wide-screen TV, access to the internet, a few dozen movie channels, and an opportunity at further education.

"Why bother?!?!"

While I’m sure the new administration will never officially initiate a "take no prisoners" policy, in essence, that’s what they’ll be forcing the men and women of our armed forces to determine in situations when faced with a "surrendered" terrorist.

"If I take this guy back, he’s just going to be released -- and perhaps cause even greater damage to the country I love…"  (And while it was only fiction, I can't help but remember the enemy soldier Captain Miller's squad released in "Saving Private Ryan".)

"Or, I can just not exercise as much caution when entering a terrorist haven, and be a little less restrained on the trigger?!?!"

This is not a good policy for our nation. This is not something advantageous to the best performance of our men and women in the field. Those who serve in combat situations should not have to be considering politics when faced with decisions which effect the lives and deaths of their units (and through their inaction in the field, their loved ones back home).

Unfortunately, those in the new administration seem to care far more about "political correctness" than winning the war. Wars are not won by being "nice". They’re won by defeating your enemy and ending your enemy’s ability to make war on you.

It's a sad day for America -- and the world, when "political correctness" invades the military.
 
P.S. (added Jan. 22nd)  I just watched the President signing his executive orders closing Gitmo, prohibiting interrogation, and affording terrorists a full battery of rights under the U.S. Constitution.   I wonder if his lap dogs in the liberal media will rebroadcast this clip of the President signing this executive order when we are next attacked -- for we certainly will be.  He has just guaranteed it.    I hope he and his fellow liberals are happy. 
 
God help us.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In honor of our VETERANS -- past and present

In honor of all those who have and still serve in our nation's armed forces...

 

 

Today, on Veteran's Day, I want to commemorate my uncle Bill who turns 89 at the end of this month. For those of you who aren't acquainted with the story, my uncle was a charter member of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion in World War II.


Initially a sergeant (an instructor) with D Company, 30th Tng. Bn at Ft. Croft, South Carolina, late in 1941, he volunteered to try out for a newly-forming unit -- something which had something to do with "jumping out of planes". It may seem strange in retrospect, as today we all take paratroopers for granted, having grown up with films of these soldiers who drop into combat from the skies. However, in 1941, there were no such units in the United States military, and no one was quite sure that the concept would even work. As my uncle later recounted to me, he and his fellow troopers were guinea pigs.

Giving up his sergeant's stripes to try-out for the experimental paratrooper unit, my uncle began attending parachute school with the newly-activated paratroopers at Ft. Benning, Georgia in November 1941 (just weeks before Pearl Harbor). The unit's qualifying jumps were made the last week of January 1942, and my uncle received his jump wings at graduation (along with the rest of his battalion) on February 7th.

The batallion (initially designated as the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Parachute Infantry Regiment) continued with combat firing exercises at Ft. Benning, before moving on to Ft. Bragg (South Carolina) the end of March.

According to We Jumped To Fight (a subsequent book by the unit CO's Maj. Edson Raff):

"On and on went our training. Night and day, the battalion pumped on, or hiked through the Overhills area. The keeness of the men was apparent. When I told them that we were going places some day, that our battalion would do any and all jobs, fighting either the Japs, the Germans, or both, if I had to volunteer to do it, they cheered. I knew they could fight, but one thing I instilled in them. They must be more than mere jumpers. They were ground fighters -- troopers with parachutes, who must view the trip to battle as nothing more than a truck ride. They gloried not solely in jumping, but in being able to move fast and stealthily after hitting the ground."

While at Ft. Bragg, my uncle's unit conducted a demonstration exercise for Army Chief-of-Staff, General George C. Marshall and visiting British Field Marshal, Sir John Dill. Then, in late May, when the War Department asked CO of 503rd PIR to select his "best battalion" for immediate redeployment overseas, my uncle's unit was selected.

Boarding the Queen Elizabeth in New York City on June 4th, 1942, my uncle's unit were the first American paratroopers deployed to the European theatre in World War II. Six days later, they arrived in Scotland -- the first U.S. infantry to arrive in Britain. (They would remain the only American forces in Britian through the beginning of August.)

For the next several weeks, the troopers camped at near Hungerford (in Berkshire), training at the British obstacle course at Chilton Foliat. When speaking to me about his service (in March 2007), he casually recounted a few rowdy antics during his time in England. During this period of training, he also eventually made sergeant again with the paratroopers, but was busted back down to corporal for fighting with another sergeant with whom he had frequent "disagreements".

The end of July 1942, the unit redeployed to Mortehoe, in Devon (which included a 13 hour, 35 mile march from the train station at Taunton), where they (once again) commensed with combat firing exercises. My uncle remembers how his unit broke the time record for going through the British commando assault course at Woolacombe (twice in one day -- on July 30th), and chuckled at the memory.

In August, the unit began preparation (both day and night jumps) for their upcoming, combat deployment. On August 29th, the unit participated in an exhibition jump in Northern Ireland (for celebrities -- including Al Jolson and Merle Oberon) -- a jump which still, to this day, holds the record as being the lowest altitude mass parachute jump ever executed: 150 feet. (My uncle remembers that jump: "You no sooner left the plane, and you were on the ground. Boom!!")


On November 7th, the unit flew into history as they boarded their C47's in Cornwall for the 8-hour, night flight to North Africa for Operation Torch -- the longest combat parachute deployment of WWII: 1600 miles (and the first American paratroopers to drop into combat).

My uncle's plane was shot down and landed in Algeria, where the 509th engaged enemy forces at Tafaraqui, then subsequently (throughout November and December 1942) at Tebessa and Youks Les Bains Airfields, Gafasa, El Guettar, Sbietla, and Faid Pass (where the 509th became the first American ground units to engage German troops).

Leaving Africa, the 509th next participated in the invasion of Italy: Operation Avalanche. On Sept. 15, 1943, the battalion was night-dropped behind enemy lines at Avellino -- where, for two weeks, the 509th disrupted the German rear, forcing the Germans to keep units on anti-parachute missions which otherwise would've been sent to repel the American forces landing at the beachhead at Salerno. Small groups of troopers ambushed enemy patrols, shot up convoys, attacked outposts, mined roads, blew up bridges and cut telephone lines, knocking out German communications.


Recalling his "night jump behind enemy lines", my uncle mentioned how he'd landed on rocks, hurting his leg. Initially alone for two or three days, he avoided German patrols until he eventually met up with others from his unit, then joined them in creating havoc for the Germans -- and they for him (twice during this period, he'd had his gun shot out from his hands by a German sniper).

Last March (2007), I asked him what it was like being alone those few days, and he said that Italian people would give him food -- raw eggs and some canned stuff (American rations which they had somehow acquired). He said he'd avoided the Germans by going up the mountain, as the Germans were down in the valley (in town). When linked with his men, they did recon work and reported back on enemy troop numbers at various locations, sniped German patrols, blew up bridges, etc.

In November of 1943, the 509th (along with the 1st Ranger Battalion) was trucked to Venafro, where (on the slopes of Mount Croce) they faced an unrelenting barrage of enemy artillery fire for the better part of the next thirty-four days. In recounting this to me last year, my uncle told how a shell hit near his foxhole, dazing him. I asked if he had been sent to the hospital, and he said that he hadn't. His buddy grabbed him and he was alright -- but had lost his memory for two days.

When my uncle's company (E Company) was relieved and sent to Naples on December 14th, only 43 men and 3 officers remained. Two days later, the battalion was reinforced and restructured (redesignating the companies: D to A, E to B, and F to C), in preparation for the impending Operation Shingle (the amphibious assault on Anzio).

Early on the morning of January 22, 1944, the 509th once again made history, landing amphibiously at Anzio, where they quickly secured the beach before heading inland toward their objective -- the town of Nettuno (which was taken later that afternoon). Over the next few days, the 509th continued to press further inland, eventually advancing to the road junction near Padiglione, where further hostilies ensued. On January 30th, B company lead an attack against the 104th Panzergrenadier Regt. near Carano, reaching the hill (east of Carano Creek) within an hour.

The next four weeks saw continued fighting in the sector, including actions taken while on patrol near Carano (for which Cpl. Paul B. Huff was later awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor). Then on February 29th, 3 German divisions (of the LXXVI Panzer Corps) attacked across the US 3rd Inf Div front. The heavist attacks (from the west of Cisterna) were directed against the paratroopers of the 509th, who was assigned a critical defensive position near the town of Carano, which they held despite heavy losses.

(As I related in a previous post) my uncle's company (B Company) was defending a low hill a mile northeast of Carano when it was struck shortly before dawn by waves of the 1028th Panzier Grenadier Regt advancing under the cover of a smokescreen. For the next eleven hours, B Company repulsed the attack, hand-to-hand, outnumbered 3-to-1, while simultaneously receiving friendly mortar fire on their own position -- which Corps Artillery had assumed (incorrectly) to have been overrun.

Later that evening, the survivors of B Company were ordered to withdraw, but only a single officer and twenty-two of his men returned from Carano -- for which the 509th was subsequently honored as the first American parachute unit to be awarded a Presidential Unit Citation.


Shortly after Anzio, my uncle was rotated home.

 

 

 

When I asked my uncle (last March) if he wanted to say anything at all about his service or his unit, he only replied that they were all "men" in his unit, and how he was "proud" to have served with them.

However, the most telling thing my uncle's ever said to me about his wartime experiences has nothing to do with the men with whom he served, nor the battles they fought (most of which, he's mercifully blocked out of his memory), but in his remarks about how he never watches anything about the war on television -- documentaries, movies -- nothing. If he accidentally happens to flip onto something, he told me he immediately turns it off.


On behalf of all of us who live in freedom today because of what veterans (like my uncle, and so many others) have done (and are doing) , I want to express my sincerest gratitude and respect.

 

 

We can never thank you enough.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Stupidly Watched CNN yet AGAIN...

I know.  You'd think I'd have learned my lesson last week (or rather, ten years ago, when I first pledged never to watch news on any network except for FOX NEWS)...
 
Apparently, I'm not the quickest study.
 
Okay.  I'm sorry.  I need to know what's going on, and (unfortunately) CNN is the only network my basic TV service provides (another liberal conspiracy, no doubt)(why isn't FOX NEWS in their basic package, but CNN is???)...
 
I'd like to know what credentials Campbell Brown has to call herself a journalist. 
 
Oh, I know.  You can go to her page at CNN and see a list of credentials -- and learn about how pigs can fly -- and that liberals tell the truth -- and JFK was a great President (if JFK hadn't been shot, I'd guarantee that 99% of people born after the 1960's would've never even heard of him)...
 
I just had the great misfortune of listening to her interview a McCain campaign spokesman (Tucker Bounds) -- or rather, her shrill, squealing, high-pitched protestations, where she repeatedly asked the same question over and over again (apparently, the woman is either hard of hearing, or more likely, hard of discerning).
 
After which, she added something along the lines of, "I'm not really picking on you.  It's just something we all want to know."  "I'm not belittling anything.  I'm just curious."
 
(Apparently, she enjoyed herself so much, she re-ran the same segment, just 30 minutes after it initially aired LIVE.  This woman must really enjoy hearing her screechy, shrill, idiotic inquistion more than we do.)
 
Oh, the fair-handed journalistic expertise of CNN's national anchors.  
 
She then left the McCain spokesman to question her always agreeable, liberal lapdogs with the query:  "Does being commander-in-chief of the Alaska (noticable smirk) National Guard qualify as command experience to you?"  
 
Is that legitimate, non-biased journalism?  Could this woman get a job with a real news organization (like FOX NEWS)?? 
 
 
 
Probably not.
 
 
 
Does smirking during a query qualify as viable journalistic experience to you?
 
Does a high-pitched, squealing, shrill, incessantly repetitive inquisition and badgering of a guest qualify as viable journalistic experience to you?
 
From under which rocks do CNN's "journalists" crawl?
 
Would Miss Campbell have queried so adamantly about a governor's foreign policy inexperience when an unknown governor from the state of Georgia ran for President in 1976?  -- or when another unknown governor from Arkansas ran for President in 1992?  And must Miss Campbell be continually reminded that Gov. Palin isn't running for President (as Carter & Clinton were), but for the second spot on the ticket?
 
Prior to the above-mentioned interview, this same Miss Campbell grilled another Republican guest about how Governor Palin could be so insensitive as to run on a national ticket, knowing the stress it would put upon her 17 year-old, pregnant daughter ("knowing it would subject her to this kind of scrutiny?")
 
I wonder if Miss Campbell would've asked Governor Clinton that question in 1992?  "How could you run on a national ticket, knowing that you've consistently cheated on your wife (with everything that moves), knowing the stress that national attention due to your candidacy will have on Mrs. Clinton?"
 
 
CNN -- unbiased journalism at its best  (please, insert suitable degreee of sarcasm here -- ) !!
 
I hate to say it, but even Barrack Obama has more sense than Miss Campbell (or any of CNN's anchors, for that matter).
 
 
Will I ever learn?
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Stupidly Watched CNN Today...

Several years ago (around the close of the last decade) I vowed to never watch any news but Fox. As a conservative, I just couldn't take the other networks any longer. Not that I consider Fox News a conservative network -- on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the most liberal, and 10 being the most conservative), I rate Fox News at a 5 or 6 -- with all the rest around 1.

Unfortunately, two and half years ago I moved to a location where my local television provider doesn't carry Fox News in their basic package (and I consider extra channels a luxury I cannot afford). As such, I stopped watching all television news -- something which had initially been quite traumatic for me, as I like to keep up on what's going on around the globe (I'm still experiencing withdrawal to a certain extent).

Anyhow, when I heard about Senator McCain's choice for his Vice-presidential running mate today, I couldn't resist, and I was prompted to turn on CNN (the only network to which I had access, which was covering the event around the clock).

BIG MISTAKE!!

 

The Bad News: I caught Jack Cafferty, who (I imagine) supposes himself to be some sort of journalist, reading a few emails from viewers on the subject.

The Good News: I don't own a sledge hammer. Otherwise, my television would've been reduced to a pile of broken plastic, glass and metal shards.

The afforementioned pseudo-journalist read four emails -- two in support of Mrs. Palin, and two opposed. The two which supported Mrs. Palin consisted of a few, hurriedly read kudos, while the two which opposed McCain's choice droned on endlessly about how she's incompetent, unqualified, and out-of-her-league (if they hadn't mentioned her by name, I'd have thought they were talking about Obama).

Twelve seconds of supportive email -- two and a half minutes of antagonistic calls for an erasure of the memory of Mrs. Palin from the human record.

Mr. Cafferty followed the viewer email segment with a question: "What does Obama have to do to win in November?"

 

My answer: Nothing.

 

CNN and the rest of the liberal media will do it all for him.

Unfortunately, a great many people in this country seem to be uninformed and gullable -- believing everything they see on television. Given the incessant barrage which spews from the liberal, major media on all but one of the major networks, there is no chance that a conservative candidate (or even a less liberal candidate) will win the White House in November.

BTW, I recently started watching CCTV (the English-languaged Chinese news network), which I actually found to be quite refreshing -- particularly in comparison to what was on CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, and (ugh) PBS. (The irony hasn't escaped me that a communist country's state-run news network is actually less liberal than what's on American networks.)

Incidentally, I hear many people talking about how our country needs a change in Washington -- which is nothing more than a rehash of the Democrat's 1992 campaign strategy which allowed Slick Willy to desecrate 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for eight long years.

Must I remind these people that "change" goes in two directions. There is change for the better, and there is change for the worse.

In my opinion, entrusting the Obama/Biden ticket with our nation will definitely qualify as change -- but not for the better...

Unless, of course, you happen to like higher taxes, liberal appointees to the federal judiciary (including the Supreme Court), more entitlement programs, a weakening of the military, a serious threat to our national defense, even higher fuel costs (incase no one's noticed, the cost of fuel has doubled in the year and half since the Democrats took control of Congress; had it been the Republicans who took control from a Democratic congress and the price doubled as it has, I'm sure it would've been all over the press about how it was their fault; incredibly, though, no one is holding the Democratic congress responsible; I wonder why?), etc...

 

God help the U.S.A.

 

CNN certainly won't.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In honor of those who serve...

Thank you, uncle Bill...

In honor of those who serve...

Today, I felt a need to address those in our armed services who have sacrificed much for our nation, both past and present. While it's neither Veteran's nor Memorial Day, I thought it would be fitting, nonetheless, as tomorrow marks the 64th anniversary of my uncle's last (and perhaps bloodiest) battle in WWII.

Still with us at 88 years of age, while still remembering much about his service all those years ago, my uncle has mercifully forgotten most of his combat experiences. I say mercifully as I cannot even begin to imagine what it must've been like to have experienced the horrors of war -- to have lived through them, day after day, week after week, month after month -- for the two years of active service he'd undergone as one of the charter members of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion.

While many may be familiar with the 506th (thanks to Ambrose's book and HBO's Band of Brothers series several years ago), unfortunately, the 509th has been woefully overlooked by history -- even though they were the first (and arguably best) parachute unit in the war.

As a brief history, they were the first American parachute unit deployed overseas -- ever (June 1942 -- a full two years before the much-flaunted 506th ever saw combat). The 509th holds the record for lowest altitude mass parachute jump ever executed: 150 feet (that's not a typo; it was 150 feet -- August 29, 1942: for an exhibition exercise in Northern Ireland).   (My uncle participated in, and remembers that jump: "As soon as I was out of the plane, I was on the ground.")

On November 8, 1942, the 509th were the first American paratroopers to drop into combat (Operation Torch in North Africa) -- which also holds the record for the longest combat parachute deployment of WWII (1600 miles). (My uncle participated in, and remembers this operation -- most notably for how low the planes were flying over the sea.)

The 509th also holds the distinction of having the first American paratrooper killed in action, the first to receive the Distinguished Service Cross, and the first to receive the Medal of Honor. The unit was also the first to earn the Combat Infantryman Badge. (The unit was also awarded the "red beret" by the British, and was the first American unit to be awarded a foreign badge in WWII: 3rd Zouave.)   The 509th's CO, Edson Raff, was the first American to be awarded the French Legion of Honor.

The 509th was also the first American unit to attack German forces (Faid Pass, Tunisia - Dec. 1942).  In September 1943, the 509th conducted the first American pathfinder operation behind enemy lines (Avellino - Sept. 1943), and was the first paratrooper unit to participate in an amphibious invasion (Anzio - Jan. 1944).  (My uncle participated in all of the above-mentioned actions.)

In addition, the 509th was the most decorated American parachute battalion of WWII with 1718 Purple Hearts.

Sixty-four years ago today (Monday, February 28, 1944), my uncle and his company (B) was returned to the line at Carano (in the Anzio campaign) to face what would turn out to be his last combat before being rotated home in spring of 1944.

Three months earlier, my uncle's company had faced the 71st Panzer Grenadier Regt at Venafro (also in Italy) for 33 days -- leaving with just 43 of its original compliment of 92 men.

Just before dawn on Tuesday, 29th February 1944, three German divisions (of the LXXVI Panzer Corps) attacked across the American front, defended by the US 3rd Infantry Division.

The 509th's B Company was defending an area at a cemetery on a hill, just northeast of Carano when it was struck by elements of the 1028th Panzier Grenadier Regt, and found itself engaged in fierce hand-to-hand combat -- outnumbered 3-to-1.

According to Lt. John R. Martin (B Company CO) from the book, Stand In The Door:

"The German artillery and rocket preparation began in earnest at 0530 hours, and when it lifted, they were all over us. The Krauts had reached my Company CP, and all of us were engaged at point-blank range.  Grenades were falling all over the place."

"Things were kind of calm for what seemed like a few minutes, and then heavy firing erupted on our right flank.  Some of our boys began to withdraw down the creek, and I sent them back up…  I don't know what happened to them, for their second wave began rolling over us.  We were forced down the creek with grenades falling all around us…"

"About this time we began to receive heavy artillery and mortar fire from our own side.  Yarborough told me years later that he considered the position lost, and asked for Corps Artillery on the position.  It was all downhill from this point."

According to Capt. Carlos "Doc" Alden (also from Stand In The Door):

"John Martin's and his company's stopping, or at any rate slowing down the Germans' February 29 attack is connected in my memory with one of the saddest experiences that I ever lived through. John Martin and his men did a wonderful job up there. It was without a doubt, horrible for them to go through, yet they did more than could have been expected of them. It was equally horrible for someone to go up afterwards and clean up the mess. It was my job, along with my medics, after the fighting was over to attend to those who were still alive. The sights I saw that day can unravel a guy. The sights of the many shell-torn, bayoneted bodies must be etched unforgettably in the minds of all who walked over that ground. In my own mind, it was by far our roughest day, the roughest certainly that I ever went through emotionally."

"Even though B Company was practically wiped out, it stopped a push clearly designed to split the beachhead. Somebody had to stand in the way of that drive, and fate handed that honor to B Company. Had the Germans continued on through its positions with a full head of steam, they might well have succeeded in doing that."

The survivors of Company B were ordered to withdraw, but only a single officer and 22 of his men made it to the main US defensive line farther to the rear. (Obviously, my uncle was one of the 22 survivors -- something which he will not talk about to this day.)

For their actions on that day, the battalion subsequently received a Presidental Unit Citation -- the first American parachute unit to do so.

Presidental Unit Citation --

"The 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion is cited for outstanding performance of duty in action, on 29th February 1944, near "XXX" in Italy. This battalion, depleted in strength after many days of continuous combat, received a terrific enemy artillery barrage during early morning hours. An enemy attack was imminent, and at dawn a German assault wave advanced toward the paratroopers positions. Being considerably outnumbered, the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion held its fire until the last possible moment; then every weapon opened fire cutting huge gaps in the first attacking wave. The enemy faltered in his advance; then surged relentlessly ahead under the shear pressure of large numbers of troops in the rear. The soldiers of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion fought desperately, disdaining retreat, engaging the overwhelming and constantly increasing German Forces with rifle butts and even fists. Late in the afternoon the German attack was halted. The badly battered but determined paratroopers immediately re-organized in preparation for counterattacks. Outnumbering the paratroopers three to one, the enemy had over-run the front line, but was later held to a standstill, suffering immense losses in men and equipment. The courageous and determined stand made by officers and men of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion resulted in the retention of a vital sector of the beachhead and prevented a dangerous German wedge between two infantry divisions."

Talking with my uncle last March, I asked him about his war experiences, and when we'd finished talking on camera, he related to me that in all of the years since, he has never once watched anything about the war.  If he's flipping through the channels on the television and sees something about the war -- movies, documentaries, anything at all -- he immediately turns it off.

Prior to our interview, when I told my uncle about an offer by a paratrooper re-enactment group for him to participate in a free, all expense-paid trip back to Anzio (for April 2008), he responded, "I've seen enough of Anzio."

I have subsequently understood his reluctance to return.

I mention this only to underscore the sacrifice of all those who have (and still do) serve in our nation's armed forces -- particularly those in combat, facing horrors which most of us could never (nor want to) imagine.

Liberty is not free.

Those of us who enjoy its fruits today, owe it to those who served when called, sacrificing much -- many never to return.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A World Gone Mad...

Only a brief perusal of the today's news was enough to thoroughly convince me that the world has indeed gone mad.  Not that I had much hope for a sane world prior to today, but several items on the news this afternoon seemed to clinch the hopelessness of that eventuality for me.

For example...

News item #1:  Valedictorian Shannon Spaulding speaks about Jesus Christ at graduation ceremony

To listen to news reports of this, you'd swear this young woman called for the extermination of life on earth.

To the contrary, Miss Spaulding exercised her right of "free speech" (a freedom which apparently liberals believe is only applicable to themselves) and "freedom of religion".

"Well, it was at a school, not a church gathering.  Such comments should be restricted to church!"

Oh, really?  I'm sorry.  I must've missed that qualifier during my examination of the United States Constitution -- the part which limits freedom of "religion" to "church".

"What about separation of church and state?"

Firstly, no such phrase appears in the aforementioned United States Constitution.  What the United States Constitution actually states is that "Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of a religion, nor prohibit the free exercise thereof."

Hmm... let me see.  How does one imagine that a high school graduate talking about Jesus Christ can (in any way) be construed as Congress making a law establishing a religion -- or prohibiting the free exercise thereof?  Has Ms. Spaulding been elected to Congress?  Has she voted for the establishment of a religion -- or a law which restricts the free exercise thereof?   Let me see... uh... NO and NO.

Sick, sick, topsy-turvy, upside-down, backwards world in which we live that can imagine Miss Spaulding as infringing upon anyone's Constitutional rights.  To the contrary, had the school attempted to prohibit Miss Spaulding's speech, it would've been her Constitutional rights that had been hindered.

News item #2: E Harmony sued for descrimination against gays

Okay.  E Harmony (a private business) establishes a service to help men meet women, and women meet men. 

"BAD, BAD, BAD, EVIL, EVIL, EVIL E Harmony!!!  How dare they?!?!?"

Okay.  Makes perfect sense.  I can see the rationalization now....   

"I take my automobile to an airplane mechanic, and expect him to repair it, right?  I mean, he's a mechanic.  He can't descriminate against my vehicle merely because it isn't an airplane.  It has nothing to do with the fact that he is an airplane mechanic, and that's his chosen field of expertise.  He should be compelled to service my automobile whether he wants to or not."

Better yet, let's try this one on for size...

"A heterosexual man wants to meet a heterosexual woman.  So, naturally, they should utilize a homosexual dating service.  If the service refuses to comply, they should be sued."

Yeah, I can see that happening any day soon.

Like I said, sick, sick, topsy-turvy, upside-down, backwards world in which we live that can imagine that a business must be compelled to cater to every imaginable variation and category of service or make itself liable in a court of law.

News item #3: Billions of taxpayer dollars poured into flood control for New Orleans

Oh yeah, this is a no-brainer.  A city on the coast (or very near the coast) which is below sea-level -- not to mention, in a hurricane zone.   "By all means, pour billions upon billions of taxpayer dollars into fixing it after a hurricane destroys it.  Yeah.  This is the epitome of sanity."

"Someone (obviously without too much foresight) builds their town on a busy railway line.  Then a 70-car locomotive destroys their home.  The government sends them money to rebuild the house back on the same, busy railway line -- only with a somewhat sturdier foundation (and full, 1" plywood floors, not those cheesy 3/4" plywood floors)."

Yes, I can see the sane rationale behind this move.

NOT.

We can't undo history and go back several hundred years to tell the moronic New Orleans city planners not to build their city on a swamp, below sea-level, so close to the ocean, in a major hurricane zone.  As far as I know, time-travel is still a bit beyond our reach.  

However, we can learn from our mistakes, and not rebuild a city back in the middle of the busy, railway line, just waiting for the next 70-car locomotive to come barreling along.

Or maybe not.

At the point of being redundant... it's a sick, sick, topsy-turvy, upside-down, backwards world in which we live where good money has to be poured onto bad money, to rebuild something where it never should've been built in the first place.   Come to think of it, the people of New Orleans need to talk to the people of Pompey.  I think they have a lot in common. 

Like I said, the world seems to be firing a few rounds short of a clip these days.   Go figure.

I guess that's why I'm only a schoolbus driver.  What do I know?





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »