About Me

Name: Jim
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

What do you REALLY believe??!? And what COST are you willing to pay for it?!!

What do you REALLY believe, and what COST are you willing to pay??!?

Everyone espouses opinions or beliefs -- generally, a profusion about a multitude of things -- whether something superficial and transitory (as in devotion to a sporting franchise) or profound and eternal (as with a solidly entrenched assertion in the existence of the true and only God and creator of the universe to whom all are accountable).

However, the degree to which one is willing to support and defend such beliefs in the face of resistance marks the true measure of whether a person truly believes in what they've asserted, or are merely conveying diaphanous lip-service to an ephemeral frivolity about which they hold no genuine conviction.


Profession of belief is cheap.  Anyone can claim adherence to a supposition.  But, how much of your resources (thought, time, effort, possessions, etc.) are you willing to commit to the support and defense of this belief?  Do you falter and retreat into silent anonymity at the first sign of opposition, preferring instead to avoid any semblance of conflict and controversy, or do you stand firm even against a relentless onslaught of  (sometimes overwhelming, vitriolic and contentious) disagreement?

For those who may find themselves more frequently classified among the former category of individuals, I suggest an evaluation of your “professed” beliefs in order to ascertain whether you’re (#1) a cowardly milquetoast content with following the herd of lemmings behind which you frequently find yourself cowering, or (#2) there is something for which you actually believe in fighting.

For one who genuinely holds a conviction that their cause is true, they will not only be willing to stand, but also encourage, support and even lead others in pursuit of the same.


So, what do you REALLY believe?!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Plea to My Fellow Democrats

First, I have to qualify the afforementioned title. I am presently a conservative (very conservative) Republican. However, that has not always been the case. Like my parents and grandparents before me, I was initially a registered Democrat -- what one might call a Reagan Democrat. I had supported Nixon in '72, but backed Carter in '76 -- for whom I had high hopes, only to be greatly disappointed by a man whom I feel to have been the worst President in my lifetime (current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue excluded). I voted for Reagan in '80, but then turned left for a full decade, voting on personality rather than substance and policy before I finally came to my senses and left the party which I felt did not best represent the ideals and beliefs I'd then held. Having formerly, actually voted for the likes of Ted Kennedy, Walter Mondale, Jesse Jackson and Michael Dukakis (it shames me to publically admit such now, but I feel it's necessary in order to let people know from whence I came), I now found myself longing for the days of Reagan (who, sadly, I never quite appreciated during his administration).

As stated above, my parents were Democrats into their late 50's, and all four of my grandparents life-long Democrats, but the Democratic party of 2009 is not the party of my parents or my grandparents, much less the party of Andrew Jackson. My grandparents would be rolling in their graves to see what has become of their party, and I seriously doubt they'd remain in that party, were they alive today.

Of course, I'm refering to the radical policies of our current Chief Executive, President Obama. While I was hoping he would turn out to be the person he'd campaigned as (even though I certainly did not vote for him), he has gone even further to the left than even I could've imagined or feared last November.

The most telling indicator of his views can be found among those he has appointed as personal advisors (or "czars"), most of whom comprise a Who's Who of the Most Radical Left -- including persons who believe that animals should be allowed rights to an attorney, the government should stipulate mandatory forced birth-control, or that the United States government was behind the 9/11 attacks.

To those of you who still refer to yourselves as Democrats, I ask -- "Is this the party into which you initially registered?"

"Does this best represent your ideals and beliefs?"

 

 

If not, why do you tolerate this from within your own ranks?

 

 

 

Seriously. This is not a rhetorical question.

 

 

 

While (in the past two decades, for the most part) I have always agreed more with those in my party than those outside of my party, I have always stood up against such when they stood in opposition to my views, and held them accountable for it.

 

Do those of you still in the Democratic party do the same? Or do you unashamedly accept everything which spews from your party's facial orifaces: good, bad and ugly?

 

Do these advisors of the President represent YOUR views or not?

 

And if not -- why do you sit idly by and say nothing to your representatives and President (whom you elected, and who is supposed to represent and work for you)?!?!

 

Silence implies consent.

 

Your silence tells the world that you endorse the policies and advisors of the President -- who, incidentally, are so far to the left, that even Hugo Chavez (by his own admission) finds himself to the right of the current administration.

 

Seriously, people. How can you stand by and allow the President of the United States to appoint personal advisors (czars) such as Van Jones, who believes that the United States government was behing the 9/11 attacks?! Does this honestly represent your view of what transpired eight years ago next week?! And if not, how can you allow your party, your government, your Constitution, your nation be dragged through the mud by those who do?

As Glenn Back asked today -- is it that the FBI isn't properly vetting these individuals (who are allowed into the White House and have the President's ear) or do these individuals actually reflect the thoughts and intended policies of our nation's Commander-in-Chief? It has to be one or the other. If there's a third solution, please, enlighten me.

 

 

Even if this were just a single inidividual, it would be frightening. That the President has chosen to surround himself with a multitiude of like-minded, extremists is indescribably troubling -- to say the least.

I'm shocked that no one in Congress is calling the President to account for these appointments. The Congress and the President work for and answer to the people of the United States. How can this be allowed to happen in this day and age? What has happened to our country? Have we no Winston Churchill's who will stand against their own party when their party is wrong, even if it means suffering the ostricism of that party (as Churchill had -- and suffered a decade in the wilderness, a pariah in his own party, before being redeemed by history and becoming the person most responsible for the salvation of Western civilization duirng WWII)?

Are all those in the Democratic party milquetoasts who blindly follow their leaders over the cliff to destruction like a herd of faithful lemmings? (And if you don't think there will be repercusions to the President's policies in next year's mid-term elections, prepare yourselves for a rude awakening in fourteen months.)

 

And just to underscore what should've already been blatantly obvious -- this has absolutely nothing to do with PARTY affiliation. It has nothing to do with Democrat or Republican (I've been and voted both). It has to do with the security, survival and very lifeblood of our nation.

For heaven's sake -- how can you stand by and say nothing while our Chief Executive is trampling the Constitution and appointing anarchists and lunatics as his personal advisors? Have you no respect for the office of the Presidency? Have no respect for the office of the Congress of the United States? Have you no respect for the Constitution, and the hundreds of thousands who've given their lives to protect our freedom, that you will stand silently by and say nothing while this President makes a mockery of everything this country stands for?

 

As I said, this has nothing to do with party. The President has disgraced the Democratic party -- the party of my parents and grandparents -- who were life-long Democrats, and would be rolling in their graves (along with the framers of the U.S. Constitution) if they could see what you've allowed to become of your party, today.

This is NOT the party of Andrew Jackson. This is NOT even the party of Woodrow Wilson, FDR, JFK or LBJ. Heaven help us -- this isn't even the party of Jimmy Carter, Hugo Chavez or Fidel Castro.

Is this your party? Do you agree with the direction your party is taking this country, the policies and advisors of the current President?

If not, then when will you get up off your posteriors and demand your representives be accountable and stop this madness before it's too late and we all have a price to pay -- a price far higher than most of us can even imagine?

 

 

When will you get some temerity and stand up against this travesty and trampling of the United States Constitution, a Constitution which was paid for with the blood of the patriots?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Legacy of Lincoln (a Republican)...

On the 200th anniversary of the birth of the first Republican President of the United States, I am reminded of perhaps Lincoln's greatest achievement and legacy -- the liberation of an enslaved race.

The irony doesn't escape me that now, a vast majority of those descended from liberated slaves have abandoned the party of Lincoln, and vote enmasse for the party who wanted to keep them all in chains. Indeed, if the President's party had its way, he wouldn't even be allowed to vote for President, much less occupy the office. (I am also befuddled in my attempts to understand how African-Americans see the President as "one of their own" -- particularly, given that most African-Americans are probably descended from slaves, and the President is not.)

NOTE: In voting for the 13th amendment to the United States Constitution, all 118 Republicans in Congress approved the measure to end slavery, while only 19 of 82 Democrats supported freedom for Americans of African descent. Likewise, it was the Republicans in Congress who singlehandedly pushed the 14th and 15th amendments through Congress (granting citizenship and guaranteeing voting rights for African-Americans), while not a single Democrat in Congress voted for either amendment.

This leads me to believe one of two things about a majority of the descendants of those freed by the actions of our first Republican President -- those who repeatedly vote for Democratic candidates. Either they are ignorant of the facts (that it was the Republicans, not the Democrats, who ardently supported and fought for their liberty), or abhorantly ungrateful both to President Lincoln and his party, without whom, they certainly would not enjoy the freedom and rights they do this day.

So, which is it? Ignorance or ingratitude?!?

Personally, I cannot fathom how anyone would want to claim either as the reason behind the grossly illogical fact that the majority of African-Americans continue to support the party which viewed them as property.

Just something to ponder as we celebrate the anniversary of Lincoln's birth, and why the President (who claims to admire Lincoln), has chosen instead to side with the party who wanted to keep African-Americans in chains. I find this most peculiar. Am I alone in this, or is something woefully amiss by this whole scenario?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our eternal report cards...

1) Do the Scriptures teach judgment or accountability before God?

"...because He (God) has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained." Acts 17:31 (Paul speaking)

For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. Romans 14:10

According to the Scriptures, we are accountable to our Creator, God.

2) On what basis will God judge each person who stands before Him?

For whoever shall keep the whole law, yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all. James 2:10

For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, "Cursed is everone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them." Galatians 3:10 (quoting Deuteronomy 27:26)

...for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God... Romans 3:23

So, likewise, according to God's word -- all have sinned. While God demands a perfect, righteous life (an eternal report card of perfect A's), instead, each and every one of us stand before Him as condemned sinners (have report cards filled completely with failing grades -- F's).

3) How does the fact that we are sinners bear on our status before God?

For the wages of sin is death... Romans 6:23

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? I Corinthians 6:9

"The Son of Man will send out His angels, and they will gather out of His kingdom all things that offend, and those who practice lawlessness, and will cast them into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth." Matthew 13:41-21 (Jesus speaking)

Anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire. Revelation 20:15

According to God's word, our sin (the F's on our report card) disqualifies us from eternal life, and condemns us to eternal punishment and separation from the holy presence of the LORD.

4) Is there anything we can do to pay the penalty for our sin?

Therefore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in His sight... Romans 3:20

The Scriptures declare that we cannot erase or atone for our sin (the F's on our report card).

5) As we cannot pay the penalty for our own sin, how then can we be saved?

"You must be born again." John 3:7 (Jesus speaking)

But to him who does not work, but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness..." Romans 4:5

"For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul." Leviticus 17:11 (God speaking)

...without the shedding of blood there is no remission. Hebrews 9:22

For He (God) made Him (Jesus) who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. II Corinithians 5:21

But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." John 3:16 (Jesus speaking)

"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you wil be saved..." Acts 16:31 (Paul & Silas speaking)

For whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved. Romans 10:13 (quoting Joel 2:32)

God's word proclaims the good news that Jesus paid for our sin on the cross. He took all of our sin (our bad grades -- all the F's accumulated over a lifetime of sinful rebellion against our Creator) and bore the penalty we deserved in our place.

Additionally, Jesus lived the sinless life God requires of each of us, and offers to credit His perfect righteousness (a report card of complete A's) to those who believe on Him, and trust in Him alone for their salvation.

...not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith... Philippians 3:9

We can face God under the condemnation warranted by our sinful lifestyle (by insisting that we submit our own, failed report cards), or we can accept Jesus's gracious offer of dying in our place, fully paying the penalty for our sin, and crediting us with His perfect righteousness (swapping our failed report card with His fully perfect one).

For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast. Ephesians 2:20

So, whose report card do you want to submit at the end of your life? Yours or His?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ask No Questions!! Take No Prisoners!! The Closing of Guantanamo Bay and the Disposition of Prisoners, thereof...

Regarding the President's intentions of closing Gitmo and doing who-knows-what with the terrorists residing therein who want to destroy our nation...

While I've never had the priviledge of serving in our nation's military, I can only imagine how such a decision will effect those on the front lines, facing our enemies on a daily basis. I can see them involved in operations which bring them into direct contact with the sworn enemies of our nation, and confronting those enemies on an individual basis. I can imagine those enemies throwing up their arms and laying down their weapons when confronted with the business end of an M16 (if that's even what we use these days), knowing that they'll be escorted back to sanitary, comfortable accommodations, given a clean copy of the Koran, and more likely fed better than they’ve eaten in their lives -- then be treated with kid's gloves (interrogation is verboten!), and most likely eventually released from custody right into the heartland of America, where they can freely travel and wreak havoc at will.

I can also imagine what I'd be thinking if I were one of our combat soldiers, confronting a terrorist who has thrown up his arms in surrender, knowing that our new Commander-in-Chief will likely give them a wide-screen TV, access to the internet, a few dozen movie channels, and an opportunity at further education.

"Why bother?!?!"

While I’m sure the new administration will never officially initiate a "take no prisoners" policy, in essence, that’s what they’ll be forcing the men and women of our armed forces to determine in situations when faced with a "surrendered" terrorist.

"If I take this guy back, he’s just going to be released -- and perhaps cause even greater damage to the country I love…"  (And while it was only fiction, I can't help but remember the enemy soldier Captain Miller's squad released in "Saving Private Ryan".)

"Or, I can just not exercise as much caution when entering a terrorist haven, and be a little less restrained on the trigger?!?!"

This is not a good policy for our nation. This is not something advantageous to the best performance of our men and women in the field. Those who serve in combat situations should not have to be considering politics when faced with decisions which effect the lives and deaths of their units (and through their inaction in the field, their loved ones back home).

Unfortunately, those in the new administration seem to care far more about "political correctness" than winning the war. Wars are not won by being "nice". They’re won by defeating your enemy and ending your enemy’s ability to make war on you.

It's a sad day for America -- and the world, when "political correctness" invades the military.
 
P.S. (added Jan. 22nd)  I just watched the President signing his executive orders closing Gitmo, prohibiting interrogation, and affording terrorists a full battery of rights under the U.S. Constitution.   I wonder if his lap dogs in the liberal media will rebroadcast this clip of the President signing this executive order when we are next attacked -- for we certainly will be.  He has just guaranteed it.    I hope he and his fellow liberals are happy. 
 
God help us.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In honor of our VETERANS -- past and present

In honor of all those who have and still serve in our nation's armed forces...

 

 

Today, on Veteran's Day, I want to commemorate my uncle Bill who turns 89 at the end of this month. For those of you who aren't acquainted with the story, my uncle was a charter member of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion in World War II.


Initially a sergeant (an instructor) with D Company, 30th Tng. Bn at Ft. Croft, South Carolina, late in 1941, he volunteered to try out for a newly-forming unit -- something which had something to do with "jumping out of planes". It may seem strange in retrospect, as today we all take paratroopers for granted, having grown up with films of these soldiers who drop into combat from the skies. However, in 1941, there were no such units in the United States military, and no one was quite sure that the concept would even work. As my uncle later recounted to me, he and his fellow troopers were guinea pigs.

Giving up his sergeant's stripes to try-out for the experimental paratrooper unit, my uncle began attending parachute school with the newly-activated paratroopers at Ft. Benning, Georgia in November 1941 (just weeks before Pearl Harbor). The unit's qualifying jumps were made the last week of January 1942, and my uncle received his jump wings at graduation (along with the rest of his battalion) on February 7th.

The batallion (initially designated as the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Parachute Infantry Regiment) continued with combat firing exercises at Ft. Benning, before moving on to Ft. Bragg (South Carolina) the end of March.

According to We Jumped To Fight (a subsequent book by the unit CO's Maj. Edson Raff):

"On and on went our training. Night and day, the battalion pumped on, or hiked through the Overhills area. The keeness of the men was apparent. When I told them that we were going places some day, that our battalion would do any and all jobs, fighting either the Japs, the Germans, or both, if I had to volunteer to do it, they cheered. I knew they could fight, but one thing I instilled in them. They must be more than mere jumpers. They were ground fighters -- troopers with parachutes, who must view the trip to battle as nothing more than a truck ride. They gloried not solely in jumping, but in being able to move fast and stealthily after hitting the ground."

While at Ft. Bragg, my uncle's unit conducted a demonstration exercise for Army Chief-of-Staff, General George C. Marshall and visiting British Field Marshal, Sir John Dill. Then, in late May, when the War Department asked CO of 503rd PIR to select his "best battalion" for immediate redeployment overseas, my uncle's unit was selected.

Boarding the Queen Elizabeth in New York City on June 4th, 1942, my uncle's unit were the first American paratroopers deployed to the European theatre in World War II. Six days later, they arrived in Scotland -- the first U.S. infantry to arrive in Britain. (They would remain the only American forces in Britian through the beginning of August.)

For the next several weeks, the troopers camped at near Hungerford (in Berkshire), training at the British obstacle course at Chilton Foliat. When speaking to me about his service (in March 2007), he casually recounted a few rowdy antics during his time in England. During this period of training, he also eventually made sergeant again with the paratroopers, but was busted back down to corporal for fighting with another sergeant with whom he had frequent "disagreements".

The end of July 1942, the unit redeployed to Mortehoe, in Devon (which included a 13 hour, 35 mile march from the train station at Taunton), where they (once again) commensed with combat firing exercises. My uncle remembers how his unit broke the time record for going through the British commando assault course at Woolacombe (twice in one day -- on July 30th), and chuckled at the memory.

In August, the unit began preparation (both day and night jumps) for their upcoming, combat deployment. On August 29th, the unit participated in an exhibition jump in Northern Ireland (for celebrities -- including Al Jolson and Merle Oberon) -- a jump which still, to this day, holds the record as being the lowest altitude mass parachute jump ever executed: 150 feet. (My uncle remembers that jump: "You no sooner left the plane, and you were on the ground. Boom!!")


On November 7th, the unit flew into history as they boarded their C47's in Cornwall for the 8-hour, night flight to North Africa for Operation Torch -- the longest combat parachute deployment of WWII: 1600 miles (and the first American paratroopers to drop into combat).

My uncle's plane was shot down and landed in Algeria, where the 509th engaged enemy forces at Tafaraqui, then subsequently (throughout November and December 1942) at Tebessa and Youks Les Bains Airfields, Gafasa, El Guettar, Sbietla, and Faid Pass (where the 509th became the first American ground units to engage German troops).

Leaving Africa, the 509th next participated in the invasion of Italy: Operation Avalanche. On Sept. 15, 1943, the battalion was night-dropped behind enemy lines at Avellino -- where, for two weeks, the 509th disrupted the German rear, forcing the Germans to keep units on anti-parachute missions which otherwise would've been sent to repel the American forces landing at the beachhead at Salerno. Small groups of troopers ambushed enemy patrols, shot up convoys, attacked outposts, mined roads, blew up bridges and cut telephone lines, knocking out German communications.


Recalling his "night jump behind enemy lines", my uncle mentioned how he'd landed on rocks, hurting his leg. Initially alone for two or three days, he avoided German patrols until he eventually met up with others from his unit, then joined them in creating havoc for the Germans -- and they for him (twice during this period, he'd had his gun shot out from his hands by a German sniper).

Last March (2007), I asked him what it was like being alone those few days, and he said that Italian people would give him food -- raw eggs and some canned stuff (American rations which they had somehow acquired). He said he'd avoided the Germans by going up the mountain, as the Germans were down in the valley (in town). When linked with his men, they did recon work and reported back on enemy troop numbers at various locations, sniped German patrols, blew up bridges, etc.

In November of 1943, the 509th (along with the 1st Ranger Battalion) was trucked to Venafro, where (on the slopes of Mount Croce) they faced an unrelenting barrage of enemy artillery fire for the better part of the next thirty-four days. In recounting this to me last year, my uncle told how a shell hit near his foxhole, dazing him. I asked if he had been sent to the hospital, and he said that he hadn't. His buddy grabbed him and he was alright -- but had lost his memory for two days.

When my uncle's company (E Company) was relieved and sent to Naples on December 14th, only 43 men and 3 officers remained. Two days later, the battalion was reinforced and restructured (redesignating the companies: D to A, E to B, and F to C), in preparation for the impending Operation Shingle (the amphibious assault on Anzio).

Early on the morning of January 22, 1944, the 509th once again made history, landing amphibiously at Anzio, where they quickly secured the beach before heading inland toward their objective -- the town of Nettuno (which was taken later that afternoon). Over the next few days, the 509th continued to press further inland, eventually advancing to the road junction near Padiglione, where further hostilies ensued. On January 30th, B company lead an attack against the 104th Panzergrenadier Regt. near Carano, reaching the hill (east of Carano Creek) within an hour.

The next four weeks saw continued fighting in the sector, including actions taken while on patrol near Carano (for which Cpl. Paul B. Huff was later awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor). Then on February 29th, 3 German divisions (of the LXXVI Panzer Corps) attacked across the US 3rd Inf Div front. The heavist attacks (from the west of Cisterna) were directed against the paratroopers of the 509th, who was assigned a critical defensive position near the town of Carano, which they held despite heavy losses.

(As I related in a previous post) my uncle's company (B Company) was defending a low hill a mile northeast of Carano when it was struck shortly before dawn by waves of the 1028th Panzier Grenadier Regt advancing under the cover of a smokescreen. For the next eleven hours, B Company repulsed the attack, hand-to-hand, outnumbered 3-to-1, while simultaneously receiving friendly mortar fire on their own position -- which Corps Artillery had assumed (incorrectly) to have been overrun.

Later that evening, the survivors of B Company were ordered to withdraw, but only a single officer and twenty-two of his men returned from Carano -- for which the 509th was subsequently honored as the first American parachute unit to be awarded a Presidential Unit Citation.


Shortly after Anzio, my uncle was rotated home.

 

 

 

When I asked my uncle (last March) if he wanted to say anything at all about his service or his unit, he only replied that they were all "men" in his unit, and how he was "proud" to have served with them.

However, the most telling thing my uncle's ever said to me about his wartime experiences has nothing to do with the men with whom he served, nor the battles they fought (most of which, he's mercifully blocked out of his memory), but in his remarks about how he never watches anything about the war on television -- documentaries, movies -- nothing. If he accidentally happens to flip onto something, he told me he immediately turns it off.


On behalf of all of us who live in freedom today because of what veterans (like my uncle, and so many others) have done (and are doing) , I want to express my sincerest gratitude and respect.

 

 

We can never thank you enough.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In honor of those who serve...

Thank you, uncle Bill...

In honor of those who serve...

Today, I felt a need to address those in our armed services who have sacrificed much for our nation, both past and present. While it's neither Veteran's nor Memorial Day, I thought it would be fitting, nonetheless, as tomorrow marks the 64th anniversary of my uncle's last (and perhaps bloodiest) battle in WWII.

Still with us at 88 years of age, while still remembering much about his service all those years ago, my uncle has mercifully forgotten most of his combat experiences. I say mercifully as I cannot even begin to imagine what it must've been like to have experienced the horrors of war -- to have lived through them, day after day, week after week, month after month -- for the two years of active service he'd undergone as one of the charter members of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion.

While many may be familiar with the 506th (thanks to Ambrose's book and HBO's Band of Brothers series several years ago), unfortunately, the 509th has been woefully overlooked by history -- even though they were the first (and arguably best) parachute unit in the war.

As a brief history, they were the first American parachute unit deployed overseas -- ever (June 1942 -- a full two years before the much-flaunted 506th ever saw combat). The 509th holds the record for lowest altitude mass parachute jump ever executed: 150 feet (that's not a typo; it was 150 feet -- August 29, 1942: for an exhibition exercise in Northern Ireland).   (My uncle participated in, and remembers that jump: "As soon as I was out of the plane, I was on the ground.")

On November 8, 1942, the 509th were the first American paratroopers to drop into combat (Operation Torch in North Africa) -- which also holds the record for the longest combat parachute deployment of WWII (1600 miles). (My uncle participated in, and remembers this operation -- most notably for how low the planes were flying over the sea.)

The 509th also holds the distinction of having the first American paratrooper killed in action, the first to receive the Distinguished Service Cross, and the first to receive the Medal of Honor. The unit was also the first to earn the Combat Infantryman Badge. (The unit was also awarded the "red beret" by the British, and was the first American unit to be awarded a foreign badge in WWII: 3rd Zouave.)   The 509th's CO, Edson Raff, was the first American to be awarded the French Legion of Honor.

The 509th was also the first American unit to attack German forces (Faid Pass, Tunisia - Dec. 1942).  In September 1943, the 509th conducted the first American pathfinder operation behind enemy lines (Avellino - Sept. 1943), and was the first paratrooper unit to participate in an amphibious invasion (Anzio - Jan. 1944).  (My uncle participated in all of the above-mentioned actions.)

In addition, the 509th was the most decorated American parachute battalion of WWII with 1718 Purple Hearts.

Sixty-four years ago today (Monday, February 28, 1944), my uncle and his company (B) was returned to the line at Carano (in the Anzio campaign) to face what would turn out to be his last combat before being rotated home in spring of 1944.

Three months earlier, my uncle's company had faced the 71st Panzer Grenadier Regt at Venafro (also in Italy) for 33 days -- leaving with just 43 of its original compliment of 92 men.

Just before dawn on Tuesday, 29th February 1944, three German divisions (of the LXXVI Panzer Corps) attacked across the American front, defended by the US 3rd Infantry Division.

The 509th's B Company was defending an area at a cemetery on a hill, just northeast of Carano when it was struck by elements of the 1028th Panzier Grenadier Regt, and found itself engaged in fierce hand-to-hand combat -- outnumbered 3-to-1.

According to Lt. John R. Martin (B Company CO) from the book, Stand In The Door:

"The German artillery and rocket preparation began in earnest at 0530 hours, and when it lifted, they were all over us. The Krauts had reached my Company CP, and all of us were engaged at point-blank range.  Grenades were falling all over the place."

"Things were kind of calm for what seemed like a few minutes, and then heavy firing erupted on our right flank.  Some of our boys began to withdraw down the creek, and I sent them back up…  I don't know what happened to them, for their second wave began rolling over us.  We were forced down the creek with grenades falling all around us…"

"About this time we began to receive heavy artillery and mortar fire from our own side.  Yarborough told me years later that he considered the position lost, and asked for Corps Artillery on the position.  It was all downhill from this point."

According to Capt. Carlos "Doc" Alden (also from Stand In The Door):

"John Martin's and his company's stopping, or at any rate slowing down the Germans' February 29 attack is connected in my memory with one of the saddest experiences that I ever lived through. John Martin and his men did a wonderful job up there. It was without a doubt, horrible for them to go through, yet they did more than could have been expected of them. It was equally horrible for someone to go up afterwards and clean up the mess. It was my job, along with my medics, after the fighting was over to attend to those who were still alive. The sights I saw that day can unravel a guy. The sights of the many shell-torn, bayoneted bodies must be etched unforgettably in the minds of all who walked over that ground. In my own mind, it was by far our roughest day, the roughest certainly that I ever went through emotionally."

"Even though B Company was practically wiped out, it stopped a push clearly designed to split the beachhead. Somebody had to stand in the way of that drive, and fate handed that honor to B Company. Had the Germans continued on through its positions with a full head of steam, they might well have succeeded in doing that."

The survivors of Company B were ordered to withdraw, but only a single officer and 22 of his men made it to the main US defensive line farther to the rear. (Obviously, my uncle was one of the 22 survivors -- something which he will not talk about to this day.)

For their actions on that day, the battalion subsequently received a Presidental Unit Citation -- the first American parachute unit to do so.

Presidental Unit Citation --

"The 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion is cited for outstanding performance of duty in action, on 29th February 1944, near "XXX" in Italy. This battalion, depleted in strength after many days of continuous combat, received a terrific enemy artillery barrage during early morning hours. An enemy attack was imminent, and at dawn a German assault wave advanced toward the paratroopers positions. Being considerably outnumbered, the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion held its fire until the last possible moment; then every weapon opened fire cutting huge gaps in the first attacking wave. The enemy faltered in his advance; then surged relentlessly ahead under the shear pressure of large numbers of troops in the rear. The soldiers of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion fought desperately, disdaining retreat, engaging the overwhelming and constantly increasing German Forces with rifle butts and even fists. Late in the afternoon the German attack was halted. The badly battered but determined paratroopers immediately re-organized in preparation for counterattacks. Outnumbering the paratroopers three to one, the enemy had over-run the front line, but was later held to a standstill, suffering immense losses in men and equipment. The courageous and determined stand made by officers and men of the 509th Parachute Infantry Battalion resulted in the retention of a vital sector of the beachhead and prevented a dangerous German wedge between two infantry divisions."

Talking with my uncle last March, I asked him about his war experiences, and when we'd finished talking on camera, he related to me that in all of the years since, he has never once watched anything about the war.  If he's flipping through the channels on the television and sees something about the war -- movies, documentaries, anything at all -- he immediately turns it off.

Prior to our interview, when I told my uncle about an offer by a paratrooper re-enactment group for him to participate in a free, all expense-paid trip back to Anzio (for April 2008), he responded, "I've seen enough of Anzio."

I have subsequently understood his reluctance to return.

I mention this only to underscore the sacrifice of all those who have (and still do) serve in our nation's armed forces -- particularly those in combat, facing horrors which most of us could never (nor want to) imagine.

Liberty is not free.

Those of us who enjoy its fruits today, owe it to those who served when called, sacrificing much -- many never to return.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why the rest of the world hates the U.S.A.

 It's human nature to envy the one at the top. 

Whether it's the most stuff, the most power, the best looks -- everyone wishes they had it, too.

For the better part of the last six decades, the U.S. has been the top dog.

As a side note, the U.S. didn't become top dog by choice, but rather by blessing of default -- as all of the other dogs at (or near) the top of the pile beat the crap out of each other (in their own yards, nonetheless), essentially decimating themselves, and leaving the U.S. as the only one still standing with the majority of their resources, infrastructure and economy intact.

However, history clearly demonstrates that power and wealth is temporal -- no one stays at the top forever. As such, I've no doubt that the day will eventually come when another dog will be sitting pretty at the top of the pile, and the U.S. relegated to a less enviable position.

Whether such a change occurs in this generation, or not until well beyond the lifetimes of everyone presently living, I am fairly certain that it will happen. When it does, I believe the rest of the world will espouse two, very different sentiments...

Initially, I'm guessing that much of the globe will express unmitigated glee at the downfall of the U.S. They'll be giddy in celebration. "Hah,hah! The American taskmaster has fallen!!" (insert ecstatic, drunken revelry here)

After a while, however, I imagine that it will dawn on many of them that the nation who single-handedly has given more to the rest of the world (its enemies, included) has stopped sending the checks, and sadly, the era of global welfare will have ended.

They will also likely realize (in relative short order) that the nation which could consistently be depended upon to bail their posteriors out of the fire was conspicuously missing. "Oh dear! There's no one standing between that nasty neighbor and me anymore!! And I don't like the way they're eyeing-up my resources/wealth/citizenry/take your pick..."

For all of the U.S.'s faults (and yes, we've had plenty) the U.S. could've played the card the Soviets had in Eastern Europe, and occupied all of Western Europe with satellite, puppet regimes. They could've pulled out of Europe altogether, and let Stalin march to the Atlantic (and then some). They could've ignored a lot of their neighbor's "little problems", for which they consistently and willingly shed the blood of their youth for causes which (in no way) had any bearing on the way we lived our lives back here in the good old U.S.A.

I can only hope (for the sake of those who have been the ungrateful recipients of America's good will) that when that day does come, that whoever succeeds the U.S. to the top of the pile will demonstrate at least a fraction of compassion and generosity that the U.S. has over the past six decades. After all, there's no guarantee that the next top dog has to be a Truman or Marshall. He (or she) could just as well be a Nero, Ghengis Khan, Napoleon, Hitler, or Stalin.

Sometimes one never realizes how good one has it until it's gone.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »